Research

Sign up to our research email list and gain free access to our latest piece.

To view research in full (except for webinar clips and other pieces labelled ‘free’) you need a paid subscription.

  • The remarkable performance of risk assets in 2023 is not primarily due to the growing likelihood of a soft landing
  • It instead reflects markets being buffeted by extraordinary amounts of central bank liquidity
  • For now, those technicals remain positive, but beyond Q1 they should fade or reverse
  • Underlying momentum in growth, earnings and inflation - beyond sticky supply-side effects - is significantly weaker
  • Hark! The VC angels sing
  • God rest ye, merry crypto bros
  • While PMs watched tech stocks take flight
  • I'm dreaming of a tight market
  • To be sung, please, in a spirit of global harmony
  • The biggest surprise of 2023 was not the resilience of the US consumer
  • It was that central banks added nearly $1tn in liquidity, rather than removing $1tn as had been widely expected.
  • This swing alone is worth 20% on equities - almost exactly the YTD gain in the S&P.
  • We think 2024 will show central banks have overtightened rates whilst simultaneously overstimulating risk assets.
  • But we also fear their misunderstanding of the dynamics means they may yet do more of both.
  • The rally does not reflect the likelihood of a soft landing
  • It is the direct consequence of a surge in Fed liquidity
  • Widespread misunderstanding of these dynamics increases the likelihood of more rate rises and a harder landing later
  • Poor risk asset performance in Sep/Oct reduces gap to CB liquidity
  • Fed $300bn reserve increase over past eight weeks helps explain renewed rally in S&P
  • Conversely, despite talk of stimulus, China liquidity injections remain lacklustre
  • Liquidity outlook still driven by RRP - and is much less negative than might be expected
  • Persistent fiscal deficits are increasingly cited as the #1 reason to short bonds
  • But the historical record is remarkably and perplexingly clear
  • High debt levels, and even high fiscal deficits, have historically been associated with bond yields falling, not rising
  • Only in part does this reflect factors like financial repression
  • It is also due to the counterintuitive nature of the credit creation process itself
  • Is the mini-correction in markets a foretaste of something bigger, or does the still-strong real economy give risk assets scope to bounce back?
  • Should investors be rotating out of equities and into bonds, or are the latter still vulnerable to buyers' strikes against a backdrop of fiscal indiscipline?
  • Free to view by all registered subscribers
  • It's not just a stronger economy
  • Nor even those long and variable lags
  • It's that markets are being driven by money flows and not rate levels
  • It is often said that QE held down bond yields, meaning QT should be a major contributor to this year's rise
  • But the evidence for this is deeply questionable
  • QE does indeed hold down real yields, through a portfolio balance effect
  • But it also pushes up inflation breakevens via signalling
  • What is missing so far from this round of QT is the historical fall in breakevens
  • The true driver of higher bond yields lies with inflation, not QT
  • CB liquidity still a better explanation of risk asset performance than many fundamentals
  • H1 liquidity injections now fading
  • Market performance - despite some prior 'excess' - largely fading in line
  • Prospects mostly negative but depend on RRP, BoJ and explanation for the prior 'excess'
Share:

By subscribing, I consent to the privacy policy.

Sign in with Microsoft
satori insights full logo transparent

Login successful.