Research

Sign up to our research email list and gain free access to our latest piece.

To view research in full (except for webinar clips and other pieces labelled ‘free’) you need a paid subscription.

  • We have been arguing markets face greater risk of melt-up than melt-down
  • But the speed and extent to which many levels are deviating, not only from fundamentals but even from many technicals, is striking
  • Expect fund inflows to continue to swamp such concerns - but watch for any sign of faltering
  • The significance of last week's FOMC lies neither with the rate view, nor with the earlier, larger taper of QT - mildly bullish though both of these are.
  • It comes instead from the stark asymmetry of the response function which was described.
  • While the true test remains with the details of the liquidity outlook, in conjunction with the Treasury refunding this opens the door to a continued cross-asset rally through Q2.
  • Free clip from first ten minutes of 2 May webinar
  • The exuberance in risk assets is less a consequence of a stronger economy than a driver of it
  • The expectation of rate easing was never critical - which is why the exuberance has largely persisted even as yields have backed up
  • It is instead the direct consequence of investor crowding following easy central bank balance sheet policy - and vulnerable to any reduction in CB liquidity
  • Relative CCC cliff risk has risen to record highs
  • This partly reflects hidden idiosyncratic risks from low recoveries and abandoned covenants
  • But mostly it signifies the macro suppression of index spreads
  • The $280bn weekly drop in Fed reserves is the largest since Apr22
  • Just as then, it coincides with a correction in markets
  • A drop in fund inflows seems likely to follow
  • But this still feels more like seasonal correction than decisive turn
  • Financial conditions have eased to the same levels as 2007
  • This comes in spite of central banks thinking they are running restrictive policy
  • The nature and timing of the market moves suggest these not so much reflect or anticipate the strength of the economy as drive it
  • Their ultimate cause is easy balance sheet policy having crowded investors into risk
  • Misunderstanding of these dynamics increases the likelihood of bubbles and subsequent busts
  • The latest central bank research on QT is careful, rigorous, and grounded in the literature
  • Unfortunately its main conclusion - that QE affects markets while QT doesn't - is at odds with the lived experience of most market participants
  • There is a much simpler reason why QT has had so little apparent impact
  • Misunderstanding of this dynamic greatly contributes to the likelihood of future policy mistakes
  • The rally in risk is often attributed to strong earnings
  • But calendar earnings estimates have mostly been falling
  • Macro drivers, not organic estimate optimism, are the true source of the markets' strength
  • After several months of liquidity tailwinds, risk asset pricing is starting to look excessive
  • Improving spending, orders and hiring are all positives
  • Despite this, earnings estimates are falling
  • Fundamentals are reflective more of sticky supply than of dynamic demand
  • Ongoing price pressures may well curtail central banks' desire for dovishness
  • But excitement about higher r* remains overdone
  • Free-to-view replay of first segment of 16 Jan webinar
  • Why strategists struggled in 2023
  • A better way to think about markets
  • Implications for 2024
Share:

By subscribing, I consent to the privacy policy.

Sign in with Microsoft
satori insights full logo transparent

Login successful.