Research

Sign up to our research email list and gain free access to our latest piece.

To view research in full (except for webinar clips and other pieces labelled ‘free’) you need a paid subscription.

  • The $280bn weekly drop in Fed reserves is the largest since Apr22
  • Just as then, it coincides with a correction in markets
  • A drop in fund inflows seems likely to follow
  • But this still feels more like seasonal correction than decisive turn
  • Financial conditions have eased to the same levels as 2007
  • This comes in spite of central banks thinking they are running restrictive policy
  • The nature and timing of the market moves suggest these not so much reflect or anticipate the strength of the economy as drive it
  • Their ultimate cause is easy balance sheet policy having crowded investors into risk
  • Misunderstanding of these dynamics increases the likelihood of bubbles and subsequent busts
  • The latest central bank research on QT is careful, rigorous, and grounded in the literature
  • Unfortunately its main conclusion - that QE affects markets while QT doesn't - is at odds with the lived experience of most market participants
  • There is a much simpler reason why QT has had so little apparent impact
  • Misunderstanding of this dynamic greatly contributes to the likelihood of future policy mistakes
  • The rally in risk is often attributed to strong earnings
  • But calendar earnings estimates have mostly been falling
  • Macro drivers, not organic estimate optimism, are the true source of the markets' strength
  • After several months of liquidity tailwinds, risk asset pricing is starting to look excessive
  • Improving spending, orders and hiring are all positives
  • Despite this, earnings estimates are falling
  • Fundamentals are reflective more of sticky supply than of dynamic demand
  • Ongoing price pressures may well curtail central banks' desire for dovishness
  • But excitement about higher r* remains overdone
  • Free-to-view replay of first segment of 16 Jan webinar
  • Why strategists struggled in 2023
  • A better way to think about markets
  • Implications for 2024
  • The remarkable performance of risk assets in 2023 is not primarily due to the growing likelihood of a soft landing
  • It instead reflects markets being buffeted by extraordinary amounts of central bank liquidity
  • For now, those technicals remain positive, but beyond Q1 they should fade or reverse
  • Underlying momentum in growth, earnings and inflation - beyond sticky supply-side effects - is significantly weaker
  • Hark! The VC angels sing
  • God rest ye, merry crypto bros
  • While PMs watched tech stocks take flight
  • I'm dreaming of a tight market
  • To be sung, please, in a spirit of global harmony
  • The biggest surprise of 2023 was not the resilience of the US consumer
  • It was that central banks added nearly $1tn in liquidity, rather than removing $1tn as had been widely expected.
  • This swing alone is worth 20% on equities - almost exactly the YTD gain in the S&P.
  • We think 2024 will show central banks have overtightened rates whilst simultaneously overstimulating risk assets.
  • But we also fear their misunderstanding of the dynamics means they may yet do more of both.
  • The rally does not reflect the likelihood of a soft landing
  • It is the direct consequence of a surge in Fed liquidity
  • Widespread misunderstanding of these dynamics increases the likelihood of more rate rises and a harder landing later
Share:

By subscribing, I consent to the privacy policy.

Sign in with Microsoft
satori insights full logo transparent

Login successful.